How old do you have to be to feel that you’re “past it”?
Should you retire at any particular age, when you’re bored, or when you’re seen as incompetent?
Australia’s government, in a period of widespread staff shortages, wants more people to stay on the job longer. The old “gold watch at 65” tradition is out-dated, we’ve been told.
Prime Minister John Howard is currently 67, and he doesn’t think he’s too old for his job. He thinks Kevin Rudd is a bit too young, and inexperienced to lead us.
The electorate will make a selection later this year, but I wonder if it will be on the basis of age?
A few generations ago, considerable age was a basic requirement of leadership. Throughout Asia, by long tradition, the elderly are revered for their experience and wisdom, and their ancestors are worshipped, but I don’t think I can plead that case with much effect. We’re in a different world now than in the days of our fathers.
I believe that age should be assessed in terms of effectiveness and mental and physical health In any case, you can be sure that I don’t want to go back to work!
About Me
- Mike
- Adelaide (Salisbury East), S. A., Australia
- "You can't keep an old dog down", so the saying goes. Likewise, its hard to keep an old journo quiet while he's still around.
1 comment:
Age does not matter if the person is capable and doesn't fall down on the job. John Howard's doing a good job, and Kevin Rudd, despite his "youth" may be a good PM. But the baggage he would bring with him is a worry. Better the devil you know. . . . . .and I too am not going back to work. Too much fun to be had in life! (And shoes to buy)
Post a Comment